|
Home > Our
Publications > Australian
Outlook> 2009> July
No more split parent applications
By Jennifer Hay
CONTRIBUTORY Parent split visa applications granted on or after July 1,
2009 will be faced with a five-year ban before being able to sponsor
their partners to Australia.
The split application strategy has been used by some parents as a way
of avoiding the high second contribution fee that applies to each
parent included in a contributory parent visa application. As of July
1, 2009, this second visa application charge will be AU$34,330 per
parent.
Applicants that apply in this way avoid the second contribution fee by
only applying for a contributory parent visa for one parent. The other
parent is subsequently sponsored for a spouse visa once the first
parent has been granted their contributory parent visa and is resident
in Australia.
A further advantage to parents applying with the split method is that
the second parent, who is sponsored for a spouse visa, will not be
subject to the 10-year waiting period for Government benefits that also
applies to parent visas. Spouse visa applicants are, in contrast, able
to access Government benefits within two years.
Contributory parent visas also have a mandatory 10-year bond applicable
to each parent, while the spouse visas also do not have this
requirement. All in all there are a number of benefits to parents
applying with a split application and it has been a method that has
been used successfully by parents without the financial capacity to pay
the second contribution fee for both parents.
The new five-year ban will apply to applicants who are granted a
permanent contributory parent visa on or after July 1 and who were
either engaged or in a married or de facto relationship with their
partners on or before the date their permanent Contributory Parent Visa
was granted.
The Government argues that the high parent contribution fee is designed
to offset the costs of parent migration to Australia and that the
contribution should rightly be paid by both parents. I cannot agree,
however, with a ban that applies to applications that have already been
lodged but not yet granted.
These are applications were lodged in good faith with the understanding
that the split application method was not prohibited under migration
legislation. The ban also discriminates against poorer parents who
should have the same rights to join their children in Australia.
If such a ban is to be implemented it should, at the very least, only
apply to applications that are submitted on or after July 1, 2009 so
that applicants are aware of what they are applying for at the time of
application. Some parents may have had a split application waiting to
be processed for 18 months and will only now be hearing about the new
five-year ban. Had these applicants been aware of this at the time of
application, they would not have proceeded with their split
applications.
The Department of Immigration & Citizenship has indicated that the
limitation may not apply in compelling circumstances, which are not
financially related, but there will obviously be many applicants who
are severely disadvantaged by the changes. |