|
Home
> Our Publications > New Zealand Outlook > 2002 > March New policy focus
is on job offer THE General Skills
Category (GSC) criteria have been adjusted to provide a
points premium for migrants with offers of employment
that are directly relevant to their qualifications or
work experience.
Priority will be given to skilled migrants who are able
to directly match their capabilities with skilled labour
market opportunities in New Zealand. The adjustment took
effect from February 4, 2002.
Applicants will then receive five points for an offer of
employment relevant to their qualifications or work
experience and two points for an offer of employment not
relevant to their qualifications or work experience.
Currently, any job offer, whether or not it is relevant
to qualifications or work experience, is awarded five
points.
Allocation of points
Also from February 4, 2002, only applicants with a
relevant job offer (one that is worth five points) will
be able to claim points for work experience that is not
relevant to their qualifications.
This means applicants with a non-relevant job offer (one
that is worth two points) can only claim points for work
experience that is relevant to their qualifications.
Previously, applicants with any offer of employment were
awarded points for all work experience whether or not it
was relevant to qualifications.
Why is the adjustment being made?
Experience shows that migrants are more likely to make a
greater contribution to New Zealand's economic and social
future, settle quickly and remain permanently if they are
able to directly use their particular skills in their
working lives.
The adjustment does recognise and does acknowledge that a
job offer of some kind gives migrants a settlement
advantage, and they will gain two points for settlement
factors, it just doesn't necessarily qualify them for the
premium number of points they can score. The aim of the
adjustment is to focus migrant selection on those with
high skill levels, and high employability and settlement
potential.
This adjustment to policy makes it clear to people
seeking residence in New Zealand that New Zealand
welcomes highly qualified, highly skilled migrants and
that we place a premium on ensuring that they settle well
in New Zealand. New Zealanders do not like to see highly
qualified people placed in inappropriate jobs.
It makes better social and economic sense for skilled and
qualified migrants to have jobs where they can apply that
training, and experience.
What happens to unprocessed applications?
Applications that were received before February 4 are
being processed under the old policy. The new policy will
apply to all applications received from February 4, 2002.
Why doesn't the Government increase the General Skills
Category passmark?
Increasing the passmark primarily helps to manage the
number of people who gain residence. Adjusting the
passmark will not necessarily achieve the objective of
linking desirable employability factors to gaining
residence. This policy adjustment achieves our objective
by directly linking a job offer relevant to
qualifications or work experience to a points premium.
This premium will continue to apply whether the passmark
moves up or down in the future.
The assessment of whether a job offer is
"relevant" and attracts five points, or
"non relevant" and attracts two points, will be
made by the NZIS. The NZIS has criteria for making those
assessments. Those criteria are:
An offer of employment is assessed as relevant to a
qualification if:
* The major subject area of the qualification for which
the points have been awarded is directly applicable to
the employment offer; or
* The offer of employment is in an occupation for which a
core requirement is a qualification at the academic trade
or technical level of the qualification for which points
have been awarded.
An offer of employment is assessed as relevant to work
experience if:
* The work experience for which points have been or may
be awarded is directly applicable to the employment
offered; and
* The offer of employment could not reasonably have been
made if the applicant did not have that work experience.
.
|