|
Home > Our
Publications > New Zealand
Outlook > 2007 > November
Two new reports look into hospital care
NEW
Zealand's Ministry of Health has released two reports looking at
hospital services including emergency department waiting times and
patient perceptions of hospital care.
The Hospital Benchmark Information (HBI) reports are produced quarterly
by the Ministry of Health and track the performance of all public
hospitals in New Zealand against 15 key performance measures.
The reports help hospitals to measure their performance against one another, and look for ways to improve.
Among the performance measures are triage times (emergency department
waiting times), patient satisfaction, average length of stay and acute
readmissions.
Early indications of a small number of District Health Boards (DHBs)
not meeting targets for triage 1 times were largely found to be related
to difficulties with information systems.
The corrected data shows in the June quarter, 20 out of 21 DHBs met the
target for treating Triage 1 patients in emergency departments. Triage
1 is the most urgent category and DHBs are expected to see 100 per cent
of patients in this category immediately.
The one DHB that did not meet the Triage 1 target has assured the
Ministry that all Triage 1 patients at its base hospital are seen and
treated immediately. A newly introduced patient management IT system is
being modified to provide more accurate data for reporting purposes in
the future.
Eight DHBs met or exceeded the target for Triage 2 with 80 per cent of
patients seen within 10 minutes. Five DHBs met the target for treating
75 per cent of Triage 3 patients within the recommended 30 minutes.
DHBs are working to improve their performance with hospitals developing
innovative systems to improve their efficiency, quality of care, and
the experience of the patient as they move from emergency care to other
parts of the hospital and back in to the community.
The March 2007 and June 2007 reports are the first to record the number
of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections - instead of all
bloodstream infections as was the case previously - against the number
of bed days in hospital.
The focus on S. aureus infections is because they are one cause of poor
outcomes for patients, they usually result from healthcare procedures
such as the insertion of catheters and the introduction of the
infection through surgery, and they are potentially avoidable.
Initial figures show the national infection rates for the March 2007
and June 2007 quarter were 0.21 and 0.20 infections per 1000 bed days
respectively. However, it is expected there will be a high degree of
statistical variability in these figures over time, and so it is
difficult to draw any conclusions about DHB performance at this early
stage of data collection.
Nationwide overall patient satisfaction continues to remain high at 88 per cent. |