|
Home
> Our Publications > New Zealand Outlook > 2001 > April Kiwis lose dole
in Australia NEW Zealanders living in
Australia will be unable to access local unemployment and
social security payments, following a new agreement
between the two countries.
The agreement announced by Prime Minister Helen Clark and
her Australian counterpart John Howard means New
Zealanders crossing the Tasman will need to gain
permanent residency before they can claim many social
security benefits, including the dole.
The agreement comes into force on July 1 but it affects
most Kiwis arriving in Australia from February.
Despite the obvious implications for New Zealanders, both
Mrs Clark and Mr Howard heralded the agreement as a
"win-win" deal for both countries.
The Government was advised the proposal would vastly
increase the cost of welfare assistance in New Zealand
and severely impact on future migrants who do not meet
the criteria for permanent residency in Australia,
official sources said.
"Reciprocal social security agreements between us go
back a long way but they have come under very serious
strain," Mrs Clark said.
New Zealand had been reimbursing Australia for age,
disability support, single parents' and widow benefits
that it paid out to Kiwis living there, she said
Under the new agreement, superannuation, veterans' and
some disability benefits will still be paid to Kiwis who
move to Australia but they will have to gain permanent
residency on the same terms as other migrants to gain
access to other welfare payments.
"This will represent a saving over the next three
years of around $100 million to the New Zealand
taxpayer," Mrs Clark said.
"The New Zealand Government is pleased to be able to
reach this new arrangement and put behind us a matter
which has become a serious and unnecessary irritant in
our relationship with Australia."
"Our spending priorities must be to attend to the
needs of New Zealanders who continue to live here in New
Zealand," Mrs Clark said.
Mr Howard said the arrangement was "beneficial to
both countries".
"You have the advantage of coming without...
hindrance but like everybody else you have to meet a
qualification for permanent residency in order to get a
benefit.
"I don't think that's unreasonable at all," Mr
Howard commented.
.
|